Local management and governance improve natural resource incomes of communal conservancies in Namibia
Effective governance of communal institutions is critical to the financial sustainability of community-based natural resource management economies. This paper evaluates the effects of local management and governance on income earned by communal conservancies in Namibia during 2011–2022. The authors compiled annual income and performance scores for natural resource management and institutional governance using conservancy accounting and ‘event book’ monitoring data (governance performance collected since 2019). Conservancies earning > $0 income generated a median annual income of $60,518 since 2011 and $50,283 since 2019 (17% lower than during 2011–2022), reflecting a decline in tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic despite an increase in grants received. Income increased with years since conservancy establishment, higher management performance, the presence of nongovernmental organisation (NGO) support within conservancies, and the occurrence of annual general meetings (AGMs). Higher management performance increased the probability that conservancies earned >$0 in 2011 and 2019. Income earned during 2019–2022 also increased with higher governance performance. Median management and governance performance across conservancies was only about 50% of their maximum scores, indicating greater income potential with improved performance. Support from NGOs remained critical to the financial sustainability of conservancies, and AGMs were important governance functions. Natural resource management and institutional governance facilitated income generation by Namibia’s conservancies, but more emphasis on benefit distribution could increase socioeconomic impact. We recommend that Namibia's conservancies, particularly those established more recently or without NGO presence, prioritise improving local management and governance to develop more sustainable community-based natural resource economies.
-
G.J. Roloff
-
J.L. Belant
-
K.F. Kellner
-
M. Lindeque
-
M.P. Louis
-
Mr Joseph Goergen
AWEI Research Associate
We support the free flow of information. Please share:
More content
-
Elephant culling debate is about governance, not activism
Dr Wiseman Ndlovu…The elephant culling debate is about governance, not activism. Piet Nel and Wiseman Ndlovu argue that authority and…
Articles -
Who benefits from wildlife conservation in Africa? The potential role of property rights
Tinotenda BhunuWho benefits from wildlife conservation in Africa? Usually not the communities living beside wildlife. See how stronger property…
Articles -
Upholding standards, building partnerships: The future of hunting in South Africa
Dr Wiseman Ndlovu…Reflections on SABHSSA and AWEI's 2026 Best Practice Workshop: why the future of hunting in South Africa depends…
Articles -
SAWMA 2026 reflection
Mr Kumbirai TakawiraA SAWMA 2026 reflection from the Cradle Moon conference: plural values, wild meat value chains, and what "Beyond…
Articles -
Namib Desert Oils cold-presses !Nara, marula, mongongo and Kalahari melon oils in Namibia. FairWild certified, women-led, and supplying…
Articles -
What the 2026 SADC Summit means for the SADC wildlife economy
Dr Francis VorhiesThe 46th SADC Summit never mentioned wildlife, yet its UNIVISA and NTB decisions reshape the SADC wildlife economy…
Articles -
Conservation Beyond Aid: George Ayittey’s Classical Liberalism
Dr Francis Vorhies…Classical liberal conservation offers Africa a self-sustaining alternative to donor aid: wildlife conserved through secure property rights and…
Articles -
Can biology alone predict wildlife trade policy outcomes?
Ms Lydia Daring BhebeBiological evidence decides which species meet CITES criteria, but can it predict wildlife trade policy outcomes? Why markets…
Articles -
Mopane worms and the livelihoods that depend on them
Avela Makoyi…As mopane worms grow scarce across Limpopo, the livelihoods, culture and food security tied to them hang in…
Articles